加拿大阿尔伯塔论文代写:法律原则的有效性

Keywords:加拿大阿尔伯塔论文代写

从这个意义上讲，法律原则的有效性（即推翻政府）是由事实和道德考虑的变化组合而来的。有关的事实是那些构成过去接受的社会实践。道德和政治的考虑是过滤器，通过这些过去的决定可以评估。德沃金将批准政府推翻，如果这样的行动可以在道义上是合理的使用这个过程，与各种理论应用到小学标题的问题，第二臂的分析相对简单。霍布斯，Locke，德沃金，道德是一个组件的任何方程评估行动的合法性，另一个国家的政权被推翻是不合理的除非必要保存自己的社会。马克思和CLS，作为思想的建构，是一个更加灵活的基础上考虑这样的行动。对于马克思和压倒一切的愿望，解放的不太强大的实现，进口革命到另一个国家是合法的。从类似的角度来看，CLS作为一种政治学说可能会支持这样的行动，如果一个理想的社会变革是先进的国家，起义本身的原因是不符合一般CLS原则。
加拿大阿尔伯塔论文代写:法律原则的有效性
In this sense, the validity of a legal principle (i.e. the overthrow of government) is derived from a shifting combination of facts and moral considerations. The relevant facts are those constituting the past accepted societal practices. Moral and political considerations are the filter through which these past decisions can be assessed. Dworkin would sanction governmental overthrow if such action could be morally justified using this process.With the various theories applied to the primary title question, an analysis of the second arm is relatively straightforward. For Hobbes, Locke, and Dworkin, where morality is a component of any equation to assess the legitimacy of an action, the overthrow of another state would not be justified unless necessary to preserve one’s own society.Marx and CLS, as ideological constructs, are a more flexible basis upon which to consider such action. For Marx and the overriding desire that emancipation of the less powerful be achieved, the importation of revolution into another state is legitimate. From a similar perspective, CLS as a political doctrine may support such action if a desired societal change were advanced in the state; insurrection for its own sake would be inconsistent with general CLS principles.