加拿大阿尔伯塔论文代写:洛克的理论

Keywords:加拿大阿尔伯塔论文代写:洛克的理论

洛克的理论让一代又一代的主人似乎是不公平的,只有那些能被允许拥有财产。这违背了民主的规范。洛克的时候只有业主才能投票的问题对那些没有拥有财产的理由愿意成为社会的一部分,他们没有保护个人财产。洛克是指被赋予神一般的自然权利属性,但他的理论违背基督教的基本精神。他自己提到一般拥有产权先于资本主义,和自私的拥有财产由一群贫困的另一组的成本似乎是对基督教的基本信仰。它似乎并没有握手上帝的爱。洛克为主共同利益共同所有权但共同利益似乎难以捉摸的在实际世界的所有权属性被某个群的质量控制。在洛克的理论中,一定数量的人天生是所有者和某些人天生没有在《盗梦空间》这类创建一个结构性问题无理地暴跌的一群人在无尽的辛苦而另一组不工作或不工作。这似乎是不自然的核心当自然没有创建这样的不平等。
加拿大阿尔伯塔论文代写:洛克的理论
Locke’s theory leaves generations of owners which seem to be unfair as only people who can work are allowed to own property. This defeats the democratic norm. During Locke’s time only property owners could vote then the question arises about the justifications of those without owning property willing to be part of the society where they have nothing to protect as personal property. Locke does refer to divinely ordained natural rights to property but his theory goes against the very basic ethos of Christianity. He himself mentioned commonly owned property rights to have come before capitalism, and the selfish ownership of property by a group at the cost of poverty of the other group seems to be against the very basics of Christian beliefs. It does not seem to shake hands with God’s love for all. Locke gives priority to common good over common ownership but common good seems to be elusive in practical world with ownership of properties being controlled by a certain group of the mass. In Locke’s theory, a certain number of people are born to be owners and certain others are born not to have at inception which creates a class structural problem which unjustifiably plunges a group of people in endless toiling whereas the other group does not work or hardly works. This seems to be unnatural at the core when nature did not create such inequalities.