康奈尔paper代写:两性关系方面

Keywords:康奈尔paper代写

作者和研究者，Deborah Tannen在两性关系方面做了大量工作。更具体地说，坦嫩博士观察了无数男性之间的对话关系，女性的二元关系，和男女关系。她发表了几篇与性别有关的对话的文章，如题为“话题连贯性的性别差异”（1990），她对不同年龄段的儿童在同一性别的沟通方式得出了有趣的结论。在这篇文章中，坦嫩解释了男孩和女孩第二、第六之间的通信模式，第十级。在这项研究中，她要求两个孩子在一段时间开始讨论严重的事情，而她观察身体语言，如姿势，眼睛接触的水平，和扬声器的距离。坦嫩还观察到每一个对子的水平局部衔接在谈话或缺乏。通过本文的研究，坦嫩发现了许多有趣的男性和女性交谈时的细微差别。各个级别的女性倾向于身体排列，经常相互凝视，不常看向别处。此外，女性很快投入交谈。他们的主题很少，但内容非常详尽。根据坦嫩的观察，物理定位和局部会话紧密和直接聚焦。相反，男孩倾向于坐在彼此的角度，很少互相凝视，往往更倾向于看。他们选择了许多不同的话题，并没有成为高度参与任何一个主题。当披露个人信息时，它是间接的和抽象的。坦嫩强调，任何有关同一性是不可否定的，但不同的。特别是在讨论男孩，坦嫩觉得男孩的话语不是微不足道，只是因为他们没有显示在会话实体投资。相反，他们的肢体语言与男性社会化的方式更加相关，事实上在保持跨文化方面时，这可能是一个非常重要的姿势。例如，在一些文化中，保持着严肃和有点遥远的姿势是表示尊重和保守而不是冷漠。
康奈尔paper代写:两性关系方面
Author and researcher, Deborah Tannen has done extensive work in the area of gender relations. More specifically, Dr. Tannen has observed countless conversations between male dyads, female dyads, and male-female dyads. She has published several journal articles relating to gender related conversation, such as the piece titled, Gender Differences in Topical Coherence (1990), where she made interesting conclusions about children’s mode of communication with the same sex at different ages. In this article, Tannen explains the communication patterns between boys and girls of 2nd, 6th, and 10th grades. In the study, she asked two children at a time to begin a discussion about something serious while she observed body language such as posture, level of eye contact, and distance of speakers. Tannen also observed each dyad’s level of topical cohesion in conversation or lack thereof. Through this research, Tannen discovered many interesting nuances of both males and females when conversing. Females at every grade level tended to have bodily alignment, gazed at each other often and looked away only infrequently. Additionally, females quickly launched into conversation. Their topics were few but highly detailed in nature. According to Tannen’s observation, physical alignment and topical conversation were tightly and directly focused. Conversely, boys tended to sit at an angle of each other, gazed at each other infrequently, and tended to look away more often. They chose many different topics of conversation and did not become highly involved in any one subject. When disclosing personal information, it was in an indirect and abstract fashion. Tannen emphasizes that either way of relating to the same sex is not negative, but different. Especially when discussing boys, Tannen feels strongly that the boys’ discourse is not insignificant just because they did not show physical investment in the conversation. Rather, their body language is related more with the way males are socialized and in fact may be a very significant posture when keeping cross-cultural aspects in mind. For instance, in some cultures, keeping a stern and somewhat distant posture is viewed as a sign of respect and conservativeness rather than indifference.