加拿大论文代写:美国教育

Keywords:加拿大论文代写:美国教育

1966年，美国教育办公室进行了一项名为“科尔曼报告”的全美国范围内的研究，该研究发现，很多美国儿童就读的学校基本上是种族隔离的——通常是基于种族背景。科尔曼调查发现，黑人和白人在教育成就方面存在着严重的差异，而且这种差异还在继续扩大。支持这项研究的Wilson认为“教育机会的利用在很大程度上遵循了社会分层的路线”。其他因素保持不变，Wilson观察到社会经济因素会影响学生的学习成绩。他还认为，在种族隔离的情况下，后果是有害的。查尔斯•平德休斯(Charles Pinderhughes)哀叹道，学生们从彼此身上学到的东西，与他们从老师或“隐藏课程”中学到的东西一样重要，其中包括孩子们如何思考和了解自己，他们如何思考和看待他人，以及如何应对他们。价值观、道德和伦理或行为方式是社会化学的重要组成部分。学生的“命运控制”——一种感觉和信念，他/她可以控制自己的生活是很重要的学术。这种无力掌控命运的感觉可能与学生群体的社会构成有关。将这样的学生分组到一个较低的班级中可能会加剧这种情况。反对选拔的前工党副领袖罗伊•哈特斯利(Roy Hattersley)辩称，这对(在英国)未能通过11 +的学生产生了不利的心理影响。他重申，把孩子视为失败者会抑制他们的情绪。此外，罗伊说，家长和学生的态度改变了选择，因为语法学校的学生习惯上被视为社会精英。在总结时，他警告说，选择往往会对小学产生负面影响，因为小学总是承受着不断的压力，要培养11岁以上的学生。罗伊认为选择是“父母选择的对立面——父母不选择学校;学校选择学生。
加拿大论文代写:美国教育
A 1966 U.S. Office of Education countywide study often known as the “Coleman Report” found that a lager population of American children attended schools that were largely segregated-often based on racial background. The Coleman survey found that solemn discrepancies in educational achievement between Negro and white existed and continued to widen. Supporting the study Wilson maintains that “utilization of educational opportunities follows, to a large degree, the lines of the stratification of the society”. Other factors held constant, Wilson observes that the socio-economic factors will affect the academic performance of the student. He also opines that the consequences are detrimental in the case of racial segregation.Charles Pinderhughes, lamented that what students learn from one another is as significant as what they learn from teachers or the “hidden curriculum”, and which involves things as how children think and learn about themselves, how they think about and view other people and how to cope with them. Values, morals and ethics or styles of behavior are an important part of social chemistry. A students “fate control”- the feeling and conviction that, he/she can take control of his/her own life is important in academics. This feeling of powerlessness in fate control can be related to the social composition of the student body. The grouping of such a student in a lower-class student body might intensify it.Roy Hattersley, former Labour deputy leader, against selection, argued that it has an adverse psychological effect on students who do not pass their 11-plus (in UK), he reiterated that regarding children as failures holds their emotions back. In addition Roy said that parents and pupils’ attitudes are changed by selection as grammar school pupils are habitually regarded as the elites of the society. In summing up, he cautioned that, selection often has a negative effect on primary schools who are always under incessant pressure to train pupils for the 11-plus. Roy viewed selection as an “antithesis of parental choice-in which parents don’t choose schools; schools choose pupils.”