加拿大MBA论文代写:财产权生命权

Keywords:加拿大MBA论文代写:财产权生命权

洛克与霍布斯的另一个不同之处在于他对人权的看法。对洛克来说，人权是每个人都拥有的权利，它们属于所有人，是不可剥夺的，也就是说，它们不能转让给任何人。如果有人试图限制一个人的人权对洛克来说就等于奴隶制。他提出“国家的存在是为了保护公民的自然权利”的观点。此外，如果国家(政府)不能保留其公民的自然权利，那么他们就被允许站出来反对它。今天在大多数民主国家也是如此，人民如果不满意政府制定的措施和条例，就会提高他们的声音并反对这些措施和条例。接下来，洛克不像霍布斯那样认为自然状态是不好的，因此，他认为人民拒绝特定的政府，回到自然状态，比生活在被压迫的政权中要好。然而，尽管洛克代表着“自由人”，他仍然指出人们应该参与社会契约。他说，我们应该部分放弃我们的一些权利，但不应该为了公正的正义而放弃生命、自由和财产的权利。此外，没有人民的明确同意，就不能订立社会契约。“财产是洛克关于社会契约和公民政府的论点的关键，因为它是对人们财产的保护，包括他们在自己身体里的财产，当人们决定放弃自然状态时，他们所寻求的。”洛克的财产是由自然法决定的前国家机构，是个人劳动的结果。对他来说，财产权就是生命权、自由权和财产权。他把人的/一个人的权利与拥有财产联系起来;没有财产的人就没有权利。
加拿大MBA论文代写:财产权生命权
Another thing with which Locke differs from Hobbes is his view of the human rights. For Locke, human rights are rights that every human holds and they belong to all humans, and are inalienable, that is they are not transferable to anyone else. [35] If someone tries to restrict one man’s human rights for Locke that is equal to slavery. [36] He set forth the view that “the State exists to preserve the natural rights of its citizens”. [37] Moreover, if the State (government) fails to retain the natural rights of its citizens, than they are allowed to stand up to it and protest against. The same is today in most of the democratic countries, where people if not satisfied with the measures and regulations that the government lays down raise their voice and oppose them. Following this further, Locke does not see the state of nature as something bad as Hobbes does, and therefore, he claims that is better for the people to reject the particular government and to return to the state of nature, [38] than to live in an oppressed regimes.Nevertheless, despite the ‘free man’ that Locke stands for, he still points out that people should engage in a social contract. He says that we should partially give up some of our rights, but not the right of life, liberty and property, [39] for impartial justice. Furthermore, the social contract cannot be concluded without the explicit consent of the people. “Property is the linchpin of Locke’s argument for the social contract and civil government because it is the protection of people’s property, including their property in their own bodies, that men seek when they decide to abandon the State of Nature”. [40] Locke’s property is pre- state institute determined by natural law and the property is a result of individual’s labor. [41] For him the right of property is a right to life, freedom and estate. [42] He connects the human’s/one person’s rights with having property; the one who does not own property does not have rights.