加拿大代写论文:笛卡尔的怀疑方法

Keywords:加拿大代写论文:笛卡尔的怀疑方法

一般来说，我们发现笛卡尔的怀疑方法和认知方法都很薄弱。我们不能把现实与梦想区分开来的主要前提甚至不足以成为真理的基础。虽然笛卡尔的怀疑论对于发现我们可以知道的某种知识是乐观的，但它仍然是对知识基础的破坏，而知识基础正是笛卡尔怀疑论的首要目标。问题是笛卡尔提出了为什么所有的东西都可以被怀疑的论点，例如梦的论点，欺骗的上帝的论点，和邪恶的魔鬼的论点。很难按照笛卡尔的建议,因为它是更加困难比证明是一个否定的否定(笛卡尔证明的情况下知识证明相反的),因为如果我们与笛卡尔的这些论点说服自己,然后我们必须行动起来,觉得好像我们正在经历的错觉和幻觉。这对我们来说当然是困难的。事实上，我们可以证明笛卡尔可能一直是正确的，一个邪恶的魔鬼正在欺骗我们(例如，当某件事违反了物理定律时)的例子是当我们经历了一个克里斯天使的诡计。也许我们可以说，笛卡尔哲学的主要问题是其极端理性主义和非理性主义的方法。德斯克拉底的哲学是理性主义的，因为它宣称理性是某种知识和真理的唯一有效标准。然而，从某种意义上说，它是非理性的，因为它在某种程度上忘记了人类头脑或理性的其他有效功能:那就是理性作为人类有知觉的灵魂的能力，除了思考和怀疑之外，还能想象、感觉和感觉。
加拿大代写论文:笛卡尔的怀疑方法
Generally, we find Descartes’s Method of Doubt and cogito weak. The main premise that we cannot distinguish reality from dream is not even strong enough to be a basis for truth. Although Descartes’ skepticism is optimistic at finding a certain knowledge that we can know of, still it is rather destructive of the foundation of knowledge that is the objective of his skepticism in the first place. The problem is that Descartes proposes arguments for why everything can be subjected to doubt, such as the dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon argument. It is difficult to follow Descartes’s advice because it is more difficult to prove a negation than proving otherwise (in the case of Descartes proving the negation of knowledge to prove the opposite), since if we convince ourselves with these arguments of Descartes, then we must act and think as if we are experiencing illusions and hallucinations all the time. This is of course difficult for us. In fact one example where we can prove Descartes could probably be right all along that an evil demon is deceiving us (e.g., dwhen something defies the laws of physics) is when we experience a Criss Angel trick.Perhaps we can say that the main problem of Descartes’s philosophy is both its extreme rationalist and non-rationalist approach. Descrates’s philosophy is rationalist because it proclaims reason as the only valid criterion for certain knowledge and thus truth. It is non-rationalist, however, in the sense that it somehow forgets other valid functions of the human mind or reason: that is reason as the faculty of man’s sentient soul, can, aside from thinking and doubting, imagine, sense and feel.