温哥华商科论文代写:不干涉主义
Keywords:温哥华商科论文代写:不干涉主义
弗里德曼的观点是一种不干涉主义或自由放任主义的商业观点。在他看来，企业应该以赚钱为目标，同时遵守纳税等“社会基本规则”(弗里德曼1970:1)。它假定消费者是至高无上的，能够对企业决策产生重大影响。这种商业组织的观点低估了消费者市场失灵的重要性。人们认为消费者可以将他们的业务转移到别处，正如Friedman认为消费者可以将他们的业务转移到其他生产者(Friedman 1970)。然而，如果消费者不能为另一个竞争对手的产品付费，这是不可能的。如果消费者无法支付沃尔沃(Volvo)等汽车制造商提供的安全功能，情况就会如此。综上所述，如果消费者不愿意支付，社会责任政策就会被认为是不切实际的。弗里德曼认为，对社会负责的商业政策，如促进平等，会损害公司业绩。例如，本和杰里采用了一种薪酬方案，薪酬最高的员工只能获得“不超过薪酬最低员工收入的5倍”(Barney and Hesterly 2010:7)。这种薪酬制度使得公司很难招到高级管理人才来保证公司的增长和盈利.
温哥华商科论文代写:不干涉主义
Friedman’s view is a non-interventionist or laissez-faire vision of commerce. In his view business should aim to earn money while complying with “the basic rules of the society” such as paying taxes (Friedman 1970:1). It assumes that consumers are sovereign and are able to significantly influence corporate decision-making. This view of commercial organisations underplays the significance of consumer market failure. It is assumed that consumers can take their business elsewhere as Friedman believed that consumers can transfer their business to other producers (Friedman 1970). However, this is not possible if the consumer is unable to pay for another competitor firm’s products. This is the case if a consumer were unable to pay for the safety features, offered by a car manufacturer such as Volvo, as discussed below. To summarise, socially responsible polices, can be seen as unrealistic if consumers are unwilling to pay for them.Friedman argued that socially responsible business policies, such as promoting equality, can harm company performance. For example, Ben and Jerry’s adopted a payment scheme where the highest paid employee could only earn “no more than five times the income of the lowest paid firm employee” (Barney and Hesterly 2010:7). This payment scheme made it difficult to recruit senior managerial talent to make sure that the company grew and remained profitable
温哥华商科论文代写:不干涉主义
Friedman’s view is a non-interventionist or laissez-faire vision of commerce. In his view business should aim to earn money while complying with “the basic rules of the society” such as paying taxes (Friedman 1970:1). It assumes that consumers are sovereign and are able to significantly influence corporate decision-making. This view of commercial organisations underplays the significance of consumer market failure. It is assumed that consumers can take their business elsewhere as Friedman believed that consumers can transfer their business to other producers (Friedman 1970). However, this is not possible if the consumer is unable to pay for another competitor firm’s products. This is the case if a consumer were unable to pay for the safety features, offered by a car manufacturer such as Volvo, as discussed below. To summarise, socially responsible polices, can be seen as unrealistic if consumers are unwilling to pay for them.Friedman argued that socially responsible business policies, such as promoting equality, can harm company performance. For example, Ben and Jerry’s adopted a payment scheme where the highest paid employee could only earn “no more than five times the income of the lowest paid firm employee” (Barney and Hesterly 2010:7). This payment scheme made it difficult to recruit senior managerial talent to make sure that the company grew and remained profitable
