加拿大论文代写 名人的发展

Keywords:加拿大论文代写 名人的发展

人们普遍认为，名人的发展有助于塑造当代政治文化(德雷克和希金斯，2006年，第89页)。然而，对于名人政治的出现是可取的，还是会威胁到政治文化的发展，学者们意见不一。例如，一些人认为，名人文化导致当代政治过于依赖“形象和炒作”，而忽视了“理性论证”(Drake and Higgins, 2006，第89页)。对此，Franklin(2004)认为，政治人物现在必须专注于有效地“包装”自己，以吸引公民。换句话说，现在的重点是形象，而不是实质性的政策立场，对于富兰克林(2014)来说，阿诺德·施瓦辛格当选政治职务完美地例证了这种流行的“风格大于实质”的文化(第12页)。另一方面，科纳和佩尔斯(2003)认为，这一趋势——他们称之为政治的“表演性的重新造型”或“审美化”——不一定要被视为一种消极的发展(第16-17页)。相反，通过接受并尝试理解这种发展，我们可能会更充分地理解政治演员是如何与他们的观众交流的。的确，科纳(2003)认为“中介的人格”概念不仅是当代政治的一个必要组成部分，而且是“社会生活的一个组成因素，包括‘私人生活’的领域”(第67-68页)。因此，如果表演行为是不可避免的，通过接受它- -而不是否认它的重要性- -我们就有可能努力实现一种更透明的政治文化。
加拿大论文代写 名人的发展
It is widely accepted that the development of celebrity has helped to shape contemporary political culture (Drake and Higgins, 2006, p. 89). There is disagreement amongst scholars, however, as to whether the emergence of celebrity politics is desirable or whether it threatens to create a poorer political culture. For instance, some argue that celebrity culture has led contemporary politics to depend too heavily on ‘image and spin’ at the expense of ‘rational argumentation’ (Drake and Higgins, 2006, p. 89). To this effect, Franklin (2004) argues that political figures must now focus on effectively ‘packaging’ themselves in order to be attractive to citizens. In other words, the emphasis is now on image rather than substantive policy positions and, for Franklin (2014), Arnold Schwarzenegger’s election to political office perfectly exemplifies this prevailing culture of ‘style over substance’ (p. 12).  On the other hand, Corner and Pels (2003) argue that this trend – which they refer to as the ‘performative restyling’, or ‘aestheticisation’ of politics – does not necessarily have to be seen as a negative development (pp. 16-17). Rather, by accepting and attempting to understand this development, we might gain a fuller appreciation of how political actors communicate with their audiences. Indeed, Corner (2003) suggests that the notion of the ‘mediated persona’ is not only a necessary component of contemporary politics, but also ‘a constituent factor of social life, including the realm of ‘private life’’ (pp. 67-68). Therefore, if performative behaviour is an inevitability, by accepting it – rather than denying its importance – we can potentially work towards achieving a more transparent political culture.