加拿大law assignment代写 政治游戏的方式

Keywords:加拿大law assignment代写 政治游戏的方式

这一事件对工会和雇主来说都是一个经济问题，因为他们希望从代理费中获得资金的营业额会大大增加。实习医师，这也会增加雇主的成本，根据雇主和工会之间达成的协议，雇主必须承担其雇员向工会收取的代理费，工会被视为政治上的主要经济力量。尽管联邦法律禁止工会使用非工会雇员提供的资金，但工会通常会在合同谈判过程中与政府实体谈判，而谈判的资金可以由代理费提供。这是工会向非工会雇员提供资金用于政治行动的许多方法之一。尽管合同谈判发生的大部分背景是非政治关联，但与工会的合同谈判结果往往会对政治家的职业生涯产生重大影响。例如，如果一个政治家被迫花费大量资金来完成合同谈判，他们的政治地位将因无法履行承诺而降低，反过来，一个与工会观点相似的政界竞争对手可能会被认为处于更为关键的地位。尽管这似乎有些牵强，它经常发生在美国的政治中。参与这种行为的工会并不是天生就坏，而是在经济上效率低下。他们使用资金的方式，特别是非工会员工参与这些政治游戏的方式，可能会迅速浪费资金，浪费的资金可以而且应该被用来继续为他们所在行业的人提供福利（Masters，1998）。如果这些资金不直接用于该行业的雇员，它就不会重新进入该行业的经济，并将代表工会损害该行业的经济福祉。在Janus诉AFSCME案中，被告因是最大的政治联盟之一而闻名。实习医生，这意味着对他们不利的决定将影响他们参与政治事务的能力，并最终将使工会成为对它所代表的行业的损害。
加拿大law assignment代写 政治游戏的方式
This event becomes an economic issue for the unions as well as the employer because the turnover for which they expect to have the funds from agency fees available to them would greatly increased. Intern, this would also increase the cost of employer in relation to the required liability over agency fees that are to be expected from his/her employees to the union, as per the agreement made between the employer and the union.Unions are seen as a major economic force in politics. Though federal laws prohibit unions use provided funds from non-union employees, oftentimes unions will negotiate with government entities in a process of contract bargaining, which can be funded by agency fees. This is one of many methods in which unions can make non-union employees’ funds available to them for political action. Though most of the context for which contract bargaining occurs is that of nonpolitical Association, the results of a contract negotiation with the union can often be a major influence on a politician’s career. For example, if a politician is forced to spend a large amount of funds to complete the contract-negotiation their political stature will decrease due to inability to fulfil their promises, and in turn a rivaling political with similar views as the union may be considered for a more critical position.Though this may seem far-fetched, it occurs often within politics of the United States. It is not that unions who take part in such behavior are inherently bad; rather, they are economically inefficient. The manner in which they use their funds, especially from nonunion employees to take part in these political games can rapidly waste funding.The funds wasted can and should be used in order to continue to provide benefits for those within their industry (Masters, 1998). If the funds are not used to directly for the employees in the industry, it will not re-enter into the economy of that in industry and will represent the union as a detriment to the economic wellbeing of that industry. The defendant in Janus v. AFSCME is well-known for being one of the largest political unions.  Intern, this means that a decision against them would effect their ability to partake in political affairs and will eventually turn the union into a detriment to the industries it represents .